SAMPLING DESIGN TO STUDY PLANT COMMUNITIES IN DUNES DOMINATED BY Ipomoea pes-caprae
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14210/bjast.v8n1.p25-31Abstract
This work aimed to determinate an adequate methodology to evaluate plant abundance in an area of Ipomoea pes-caprae, taking Navegantes dunes (SC, 26o54’40"S e 48o39’00"W) as a case study. Abundance as percentage of coverage was determinate using a sampler divided by nylon filaments. A stick was put at the filaments intersections and the species touching the stick was recorded. We tested 3 sampler sizes: 1m2, 0.56m2 and 0.25m2. For each sampler two different samplings were made: the species were recorded in all intersections and also in 30 randomly selected intersections. A dune zone 50mX10m was delimited, where 15 replicates for each treatment were sampled. We calculated average of coverage and standard error as percentage, for 2 replicates, 3, 4, until 15 replicates, for each treatment. The use of all intersects or 30 intersections presented no influences on the results. Coverage percentages for the two smaller samplers were about 30%, but standard error was higher to 0.25m2 sampler (about 20%), then to others (about 10%). Coverage percentage obtained by 1m2 sampler was overestimated (40%) due to difficulties to take a vertical look at the intersections far from the sampler edge. Six to eight replicates were needed when using the 0.56m2 and 1m2 samplers, and ten replicates were needed when using 0.25m2 sampler. Considering these results, we concluded the best sampling is made using 0.56m2 sampler, 30 intersections randomly selected and 6 to 8 replicates. These make possible to optimize the data collection with the minimum expenses of time and effort, and also the best description of the vegetation cover.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).