Toxicity of Two Household Liquid Soaps on Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14210/bjast.v17n1.p35-41Abstract
The relative acute toxicity and sub-lethal effects of two surfactants; Faab liquid soap (FLS) and Morning Fresh liquid soap (MFLS) were evaluated for the Poecilia reticulata in laboratory bioassays. The acute toxicity was evaluated for 96 h while the sub-lethal effects of the two surfactants on the biochemical parameters of P. reticulata were investigated for a 6–day exposure period. The derived toxicity indices showed that the FLS (96hLC50= 0.062ml/L) was 1.37 times more toxic than the MFLS (96hLC
50= 0.085ml/L) against P. reticulata. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant difference (p<0.05) in the quantal response of P. reticulata to different concentrations of FLS and MFLS at 24, 48, 72 and
96 h of exposure. The mean tissue protein, triglyceride, glucose and cholesterol ranged from (21.04 - 48.54 and 18.06 - 58.54mg/dl), (87.43 - 154.95 and 85.63 - 144.28mg/dl), (33.95 - 55.03 and 32.76 - 53.15mg/dl) and (37.30 - 65.38 and 37.12 - 58.11mg/dl) for FLS and MFLS respectively. ANOVA showed significant difference (p<0.05) in the biochemical response of P. reticulata to FLS and MFLS. The implications of these findings are highlighted.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).