EL CONCEPTO DE DEMOCRACIA: UN ANÁLISIS MULTIDIMENSIONAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v26n2.p619-643Palavras-chave:
Democracy, Political representation, Accountability, Political publicity, Democratic responsiveness, Social justice.Resumo
This article starts with the semantic decomposition of the phrase demokratos, which states a subordination of “kratos” (government) to “demos” (people), and analyzes the concept of democracy from a multi-dimensional key. In order to elaborate on the concept of democracy, an analytical distinction was established around three dimensions of government subordination to the people: democracy is understood as (i) the government of the people, (ii) the government by the people, and (iii) the government for the people or the government that serves the people. This kind of analysis can establish a good state of art for contemporary discussions on democratic theory, and determine the main ways to improve the existing democratic government systems.Referências
ACE, 2014, “Proportional Representation (PR)”. ACE Electoral Knowledge Network. Retrieved 9 April 2014.
Acemoglu, Daron; Suresh Naidu, Pascual Restrepo and James A. Robinson, 2019, “Democracy Does Cause
Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 127(1): 47–100. doi:10.1086/700936
Albertus, M and Menaldo, V, 2012, “Coercive Capacity and the Prospects for Democratisation”, Comparative
Politics 44 (2). pp 151–169.
Anderson, Elizabeth, 2006, “The Epistemology of Democracy”, Episteme, 3(1–2): 8–22. doi:10.3366/
epi.2006.3.1-2.8
Arellano, 2015, Mecanismos de democracia directa en América Latina. México. En Contexto (50). CESOPCámara de Diputados
Bajaj, Sameer, 2014, “Review of Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many,
by Hélène Landemore”, Ethics, 124(2): 426–431. doi:10.1086/673507
Barak, A, 2006, The Judge in a Democracy, Princeton University Press.
Barry, Brian, 1965, Political Argument, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Becker, P, Heideking, J, & Henretta, J., 2002, Republicanism and Liberalism in America and the German States,
–1850, Cambridge University Press.
Bedau, Hugo A., 1961, “On Civil Disobedience”, Journal of Philosophy, 58(21): 653–665. doi:10.2307/2023542
Beitz, Charles R., 1989, Political Equality: An Essay on Democratic Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press
Birch, A.,1993, The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, Routledge.
Black, Duncan, 1963, The Theory of Committees and Elections, second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Brennan, Jason, 2014, “How Smart Is Democracy? You Can’t Answer That Question a Priori”, Critical Review,
(1–2): 33–58. doi:10.1080/08913811.2014.907040
Brownlee, 2007, “The Communicative Aspects of Civil Disobedience and Lawful Punishment”, Criminal Law and
Philosophy, 1(2): 179–192. doi:10.1007/s11572-006-9015-9
Brownlee, 2012, Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brownlee, Kimberley, 2004, “Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience”, Res Publica, 10(4): 337–351.
doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6
Cassese, Antonio, 1995, Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Christiano, Thomas, 1996, The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory, Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Christiano, Thomas, 1996, The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory, Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Christiano, Thomas, 2008, The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford
University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001
Christiano, Thomas, 2011, “An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy: An
Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39(2): 142–176.
doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01204.x
Christiano, Tom and Sameer Bajaj, (2021), “Democracy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/
democracy/>.
Cohen, Joshua, 1996 [2003], “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy”, in Democracy and
Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 95–119; reprinted in Christiano 2003: 17–38.
Cohen, Joshua, 1986, “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy”, Ethics, 97(1): 26–38. doi:10.1086/292815
Condorcet, Marquis de, 1785, Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues àla pluralité
des voix, Paris; reprinted Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139923972
Crouze, Ivan, 2014, Democratic innovations: reshaping public governance? The journal of field actions, Field
Actions Science Reports, Special Issue 11, october 2014
Dahl, R., 1991, Democracy and its Critics, Yale University Press.
Davenport, Ch., 2007, State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace, Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon, 1986 [2003], “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory”, in Foundations of
Scoial Choice Theory, Jon Elster and Aanund Hyllund (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–132.
—————, 1998, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press.
Ely, John Hart, 1980, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Estlund, David, 1997, “The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority”:, The Modern Schoolman, 74(4):
–276. doi:10.5840/schoolman199774424
—————, 2008, Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Everdell, W., 2000, The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans. University of Chicago Press.
Gaus, Gerald F., 1996, Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory, New York: Oxford
University Press.
Gaus, Gerald F., 2011, The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded
World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511780844
Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society, Cambridge Polity Press.
Goodin, Robert E. and Kai Spiekermann, 2019, An Epistemic Theory of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University
Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198823452.001.0001
Gould, Carol C., 1988, Rethinking Democracy: Freedom and Social Cooperation in Politics, Economics and
Society, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grofman, Bernard and Scott L. Feld, 1988, “Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective”, American
Political Science Review, 82(2): 567–576. doi:10.2307/1957401
Habermas, Jürgen, 1996, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy,
William Rehg (trans.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996
Haldane, R., 1918, The future of democracy, Headley Bros. Publishers Ltd.
Hannon, Michael, 2020, “Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy”, Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research, 101(3): 591–611. doi:10.1111/phpr.12624
Hong, Lu and Scott E. Page, 2004, “Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability
Problem Solvers”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(46): 16385–16389. doi:10.1073/
pnas.0403723101
IDEA, 2005, “Electoral System Design: the New International IDEA Handbook”. International Institute for
Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2005. Retrieved 9 April 2014.
Inglehart, R., 1997, “Modernisation and Postmodernisation. Cultural, Economic, and Political Change”, in
Societies (43), Princeton University Press.
Kelsen, H., 1955, Ethics, Vol. 66, No. 1, Part 2: Foundations of Democracy (October , 1955), pp. 1–101.
Kimber, R., 1989. “On Democracy”. Scandinavian Political Studies 12 (3): 201, 199–219.
Ladha, Krishna K., 1992, “The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes”, American Journal
of Political Science, 36(3): 617–634. doi:10.2307/2111584
Landemore, Hélène, 2013, Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many,
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lincoln, A., 1864, The Gettysburg Address, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, November 19, 1864, http://showcase.
netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/gettysburg.htm.
List, Christian and Robert E. Goodin, 2001, “Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem”,
Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(3): 277–306. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00128
Locke, John, 1690, Second Treatise on Civil Government, London; reprinted C.B. MacPherson (ed.), Indianapolis,
IN: Hackett, 1980.
Lowenstein, K., 1959, Verfassungslehre, Tubingen.
Macpherson, C., 1977, The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, Oxford University Press.
Markovits, Daniel, 2005, “Democratic Disobedience”, Yale Law Journal, 114(8): 1897–1952.
Marx, K., 2010, «Critique du droit politique hégélien», Allia, Paris.
Mill, John Stuart, 1861 [1991], Considerations on Representative Government, London: Parker, Son, and Bourn;
reprinted Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1991
Mill, John Stuart, 1861 [1991], Considerations on Representative Government, London: Parker, Son, and Bourn;
reprinted Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1991
Ober, J and Hedrick, C., 1996, DÄ“mokratia: a conversation on democracies, ancient and modern, Princeton
University Press.
Page, Scott E., 2007, The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and
Societies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pinker, S., 1994, The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind, Penguin.
Pinker, S., 2007, The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, Penguin.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel, 1967, The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Quirk, Paul J., 2014, “Making It up on Volume: Are Larger Groups Really Smarter?”, Critical Review, 26(1–2):
–150. doi:10.1080/08913811.2014.907046
Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Raz, Joseph, 1979, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Reveles Vázquez, 2017, Democracia participativa para el fortalecimiento de la representación política. La
experiencia latinoamericana, Andamios vol.14 no.35 México sep./dic. 2017
Riker, William H., 1982, Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and
the Theory of Social Choice, San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 1762, Du contrat social; ou Principes du droit politique, Amsterdam. Translated as The
Social Contract, Charles Frankel (trans.), New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1947.
Sabl, Andrew, 2001, “Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and Its Non-Rawlsian Lessons”,
Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(3): 307–330. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00129
Sen, Amartya, 1999, “Democracy as a Universal Value”, Journal of Democracy 10 (3)
Sen, Amartya, 1999, Development as Freedom, New York: Knopf.
Simmons, 2007, Political Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simmons, A. John, 2001, Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625152
Singer, Peter, 1973, Democracy and Disobedience, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Smith, William, 2011, “Civil Disobedience and the Public Sphere”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 19(2): 145–
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00365.x
Stilz, Anna, 2009, Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
The economist, 2013, “Democracy index 2012: Democracy at a standstill”. Economist Intelligence Unit. 14
March 2013.
Thompson, Abigail, 2014, “Does Diversity Trump Ability?” Notices of the AMS, 61(9): 1024–1030.
Van Parijs, Ph., 2011, Just Democracy. The Rawls-Machiavelli program, Ecpr Press, Colchester.
Waldron, Jeremy, 1995, “The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s
Politics”, Political Theory, 23(4): 563–584. doi:10.1177/0090591795023004001
Waldron, Jeremy, 1999, Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Willard, Ch (1996), Liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy,
University of Chicago Press.
Wood, E (1995), Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing historical materialism, Cambridge University Press.
Wright, Gavin, 2013, Sharing the Prize: The Economics of the Civil Rights Revolution in the American South,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Na qualidade de autor(es) da colaboração, original e inédita, sobre o qual me(nos) responsabilizo(amos) civil e penalmente pelo seu conteúdo, após ter lido as diretrizes para autores, concordado(amos) plenamente com as Políticas Editorias da Revista Novos Estudos Jurídicos - NEJ e autorizo(amos) a publicação na rede mundial de computadores (Internet), permitindo, também, que sua linguagem possa ser reformulada, caso seja necessário, sem que me(nos) seja devido qualquer pagamento a título de direitos autorais, podendo qualquer interessado acessá-lo e/ou reproduzi-lo mediante download, desde que a reprodução e/ou publicação obedeçam as normas da ABNT e tenham a finalidade exclusiva de uso por quem a consulta a título de divulgação da produção acadêmico científico.
