GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN NATURAL AND CULTURED MUSSELS OF Perna perna (MOLLUSCA, MYTILIDAE) IN SANTA CATARINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14210/bjast.v8n1.p55-63Abstract
The aim of this work was to analyse genetically natural beds and cultures of the most commercially important mollusc of Santa Catarina (South Brazil), the brown mussel Perna perna. Two sites were chosen for sampling from natural beds and for settling experimental lines with seeds obtained from each local farm. Experimental lines were maintained during four months for evaluating the growth of mussels from different cultures. DNA was extracted by Chelex-Proteinasek method from adductor muscle and amplified by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using PMS1 microsatellite primers. Denatured 6% polyacrylamide gel and silver staining were used for separation and visualisation of PCR products, respectively. The nuclear locus obtained showed no significant differences in allele frequencies between natural stocks. Cultured mussels in Penha did not differ genetically from natural beds, but Canto Grande culture was significantly different from the local stock. Mean sizes reached in experimental lines and also from individuals collected in natural stocks were found to be higher in Canto Grande than in Penha. Canto Grande samples showed departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at the studied locus, due to heterozygote deficiency. The genetic distinction of Canto Grande cultured mussels suggests that seeds from other localities may have been used occasionally by fishermen to set lines for culture.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).